Brown v. Baird
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Oklahoma, County. Judgment in the court below for the appellee in the sum of $59.77 for balance due upon material furnished for the erection of a house. The plaintiff in error brings the case up. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dale, C. J.:
November 16, 1893, L. B. Baird and J. P. McKinnis, partners doing business as the Reno Lumber company, instituted an action in the probate court of Oklahoma county, to recover a judgment against J. L. Brown in the of $59.77, balance alleged to be due upon a bill of lumber purchased and received by Brown from the Reno Lumber company. Brown answered to the action, alleging, in substance, that the lumber received by him consisted of dimension stuff, siding, flooring and shingles; that the lumber so received was not of the width and thickness…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zabriskie v. . C.V.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Maxwell v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Haase v. NonnemacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Comstock v. SangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sartain v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Brown v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Western Silo Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Wallace v. L. D. Clark & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.