Legal Opinion

Brown v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 28, 1914No. 3650PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from County Court, Alfalfa County; P. M. Guston, Judge. Action by L. E. Brown against Charlie Davidson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

L. E. Brown, as plaintiff below, sued Charlie Davidson in the county court of Alfalfa county to recover on a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage. The . controversy arose in the following manner: Defendant bought a thoroughbred pedigreed colt from the plaintiff, who lives in Illinois. The contract of sale was made through the medium of correspondence solely, consisting of at least seventeen letters which passed between the parties. There were no oral communications relative to the matter. The result of the correspondence was that Davidson bought from Brown a colt,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Jobbing Ass'n v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Brown v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Culbertson v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Western Silo Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Bower-Venus Grain Co. v. Norman Milling & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. B. J. Carney & Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API