Legal Opinion · Dissent

Group Insurance v. Czopek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1992No. 90390, (Calendar No. 11)Published

1DissentLevin, J.

In this action for a declaratory judgment, the Court of Appeals concluded that bodily injuries suffered by police officers Don A. Czopek and Herdis B. Petty in an affray with the insured, Arthur A. Smith, either were not the result of an "occurrence” or were "expected or intended” by Smith, and directed entry of summary disposition for Group Insurance Company of Michigan. I would reverse and remand for trial.

I

Smith, who was then eighteen, walked home at 11:30 p.m. from a New Year’s Eve party on December 31, 1983. He was "extremely drunk,” having consumed, in two and one-half hours, eight…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API