Legal Opinion

Winn v. Holmes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1956No. Civ. 21187PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based upon an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a demurrer of defendant Jerry Holmes to her second amended complaint, hereinafter referred to as the complaint. The facts alleged therein are as follows: Defendants Holmes and Third Doe are the owners and operators of The Ranch House, a restaurant and eating establishment open to the public. At about 10:30 p. m. on November 27, 1953, plaintiff “was a guest and patron of said establishment,” and at that time and place and without any cause or provocation on her part, plaintiff was assaulted by defendants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Nappier v. KincadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Barker v. Wah LowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API