Legal Opinion
DeCelle v. City of Alameda
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1960No. Civ. 19226PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOLDRICK, J. pro tem. *
Robert B. DeCelle petitioned for alternative and peremptory writs of mandate directing the city of Alameda to pay him a disability pension pursuant to its Ordinance No. 1079 New Series. The alternative writ issued and the parties stipulated that the cause be submitted for decision upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was for petitioner, and from that judgment and the peremptory writ of mandamus entered in accordance therewith, the city of Alameda now appeals.
The agreed statement of facts indicates that respondent was first employed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Solari v. Atlas-Universal Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Jackson v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.