Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Stout

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1919No. 21,991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa district court; Dallas Grover, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

William A. Hurt brought this action to recover damages from E. E. Stout and Alice A. Stout, husband and wife, for the breach of a covenant of warranty against encumbrances, and as the defendants prevailed, he appeals.

In an exchange of properties the defendants executed a deed to plaintiff for a large tract of land, and in his petition he alleged that the defendants covenanted that the land was clear and free of encumbrances except an indebtedness “against said property not to exceed $5,600 on the above real estate, encumbrance of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tacha v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Linker v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burnham v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Proctor Trust Co. v. NeihartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Musgrave v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Tritle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Southern California Edison Co., Limited v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API