Legal Opinion

Tritle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1934No. 31,903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action for damages.

Defendants’ motion to set aside answers to special questions was allowed in part, and their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was allowed, and plaintiff appeals.

The place of accident was at a filling station owned by appellee Phillips Petroleum Company, at which appellee Stevens was employed. This filling station has driveways leading in from the street, and a small office building located near the pumps. To the rear is a building equipped for changing oil in automobile engines, greasing cars,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sponable v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Keir v. TragerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Adams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Roberts v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Home Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Montague v. BurgerhoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Dick's Transfer Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Harshaw v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. King v. Vets Cab, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API