McClellan v. Duncombe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from special term. Action by Clarence S. McClellan and others against Naomi Duncombe. From an order directing plaintiffs to furnish a bill of particulars, they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.
The plaintiffs bring this action against this defendant for the purpose of collecting a bill for services alleged to have been rendered the defendant in connection with the probate of the will, and the settlement of the estate, of the husband of the defendant. The defendant, before answering, made application for an order compelling the plaintiffs to furnish a bill of particulars, alleging in her affidavit that the information which she demanded *680was necessary in making her answer to the complaint. This application for an order to furnish a bill of particulars was accompanied by a request for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Credit Indemnity Co. v. BondyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Morrill v. KazisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Watertown Paper Co. v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Bender v. BenderNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Hayes v. St. Mary's Lodging HouseNew York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuster v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- International Import & Export Co. v. Di MondaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909
- McClellan v. DuncombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900