Legal Opinion

International Import & Export Co. v. Di Monda

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1909Published

Action by the International Import & Export Company against Guilio Di Monda, doing business under the firm name of G. Di Monda. Heard on motion for bill of particulars before answering.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion made by the defendant for a bill of particulars of paragraph 4 of the plaintiff’s complaint, to enable the defendant to answer. The action is upon an alleged guaranty by defendant of certain obligations of a third person, not a party to the action, named Manzella. By paragraph 4 of the complaint' it alleges that plaintiff employed the defendant as its agent with respect to certain sales made to said Manzella, and relied upon the said agreement and guaranty of the defendant, and did actually sell through the defendant as its agent and delivered to said Manzella certain goods,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Credit Indemnity Co. v. BondyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Wolff v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Morrill v. KazisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Hicks v. EgglestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Singer v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API