Legal Opinion
Hanson v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 1, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Petitioner David Hanson appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Brodriek, J.) denying his petition for post-conviction review. Petitioner argues that the reinstatement of criminal sentences, after he was discharged from those sentences, violates his due process rights. Finding no fundamental unfairness, we affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] The facts as developed at the hearing on post-conviction review may be summarized as follows: In 1987, petitioner entered guilty pleas to aggravated assault (17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983)), two counts of reckless conduct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ventetoulo v. Attorney General RICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Maurice R. Lerner v. Matthew Gill, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Theodore Littlefield v. Mark C. Caton, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Austin v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- State v. BrooksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. SternSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009