Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 10, 1971No. C.D. 4249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FoRd, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, consolidated for the purpose of trial, were the subject of a decision in Castelazo & Associates, Atwood Imports Inc., et al. v. United States, 64 Cust. Ct. 508, C.D. 4027, 314 F. Supp. 38 (1970), wherein it was held the record was insufficient to establish whether certain electrical elements of several woodworking machines were essential features thereof.

Plaintiffs moved for a rehearing and the motion was granted.

Before us for consideration is the proper classification of various types of woodworking machines…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. M. Rice & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. United States v. Borgfeldt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. Stonewall Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gene Miller Atwood Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API