Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Chester

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-CV-5891PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, plaintiffs have filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s previous decision entered January 5,1994, granting defendants’ Chester-Upland School District and Chester-Upland Board of School Directors motion to dismiss, 842 F.Supp. 147. Because plaintiffs have done nothing more than disagree with this Court and have failed to demonstrate a clear error of law, we must deny plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.

Plaintiffs John I. Smith and Patricia N. Smith initiated this action seeking damages when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Reich v. ComptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Smith v. City of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. Douris v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. United States v. JasinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Jarzyna v. Home Properties, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API