Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Chester

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1994No. 93-CV-5891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

This matter concerns a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by defendants Chester-Upland School District and Chester-Upland Board of School Directors. Plaintiffs, John I. Smith and Patricia N. Smith, initiated this action seeking damages when their daughter was killed and son was injured as they attempted to cross the street when they were walking home from school. Plaintiffs have filed a five count complaint against defendants seeking damages for negligence against each individual defendant, as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Robinson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Constanzo v. Yetzer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API