Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 22, 2007No. 03 C 3578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

Following a seven-day bench trial, the Court found in FTC v. QT, Inc., 448 F.Supp.2d 908 (N.D.I11.2006) (“Memorandum Opinion”) that Defendants QT, Inc., Q-Ray Company, Bio-Metal, Inc., and Que Te Park (collectively “Defendants”) violated the Federal Trade Commission Act. The facts are set forth in the Memorandum Opinion. The Court entered a final judgment order on November 13, 2006 (“Final Judgment Order”), ordering Defendants to provide for consumer redress, disgorgement, and restitution, and granting injunctive relief.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hinrichs v. BosmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. RKI, Inc. v. GrimesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  4. FTC v. QT IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General And Reporter v. HRC Medical Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API