Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Following a seven-day bench trial, the Court found in FTC v. QT, Inc., 448 F.Supp.2d 908 (N.D.I11.2006) (“Memorandum Opinion”) that Defendants QT, Inc., Q-Ray Company, Bio-Metal, Inc., and Que Te Park (collectively “Defendants”) violated the Federal Trade Commission Act. The facts are set forth in the Memorandum Opinion. The Court entered a final judgment order on November 13, 2006 (“Final Judgment Order”), ordering Defendants to provide for consumer redress, disgorgement, and restitution, and granting injunctive relief.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hinrichs v. BosmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- RKI, Inc. v. GrimesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- FTC v. QT IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General And Reporter v. HRC Medical Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.