Legal Opinion

FTC v. QT Inc

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 3, 2008No. 07-1662Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-1662 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QT, INC., Q-RAY COMPANY, BIO-METAL, INC., and QUE TE PARK, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 03 C 3578—Morton Denlow, Magistrate Judge. ____________ ARGUED OCTOBER 31, 2007—DECIDED JANUARY 3, 2008 ____________ Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. WIRED Magazine recently put the Q-Ray Ionized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API