Legal Opinion
Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 24, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1834PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Appellant filed this class action in superior court alleging that the State of Arizona unconstitutionally denied her right to have an abortion. She later filed a motion for partial summary judgment declaring A.R.S. § 15-730 unconstitutional and a motion that the action be maintained as a class action. Appellees also filed a motion for summary judgment. This appeal followed the trial court’s granting of appellees’ motion for summary judgment.
The facts are undisputed. At the time the complaint was filed on June 21, 1974, appellant was a nineteen-year-old unmarried…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- McClanahan v. Cochise CollegeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Wolfe v. SchroeringCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- State v. BoykinArizona Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.