Legal Opinion

Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 13, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 91-0110PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of an award of attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs-appellants. In 1981, Frank and Lo- rain Kadish, Marion L. Pickens and the Arizona Education Association (“appellants”), represented by the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest (“the Center”), filed a taxpayer action challenging the validity of the fixed royalty provisions of Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“AR.S.”) section 27-234(B). The trial court dismissed the complaint, ruling that the statute did not violate the Arizona Enabling Act or the Arizona Constitution.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Charles I. Friedman, P.C. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Weinstein v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API