Legal Opinion
State v. Boykin
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1975No. 11092-2PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKWOOD, Justice:
Appellees, law enforcement officers in the Arizona Department of Public Safety, brought suit in 1971 against the acting director of the Department, James J. Hegarty, and the State of Arizona. In that action the officers alleged that they were required to work in excess of eight hours a day without receiving "overtime” for the work performed.
In Boykin v. State, 109 Ariz. 289, 508 P.2d 1151 (1973), we held that while “this is properly a class action” under Rule 23 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., the officers’ reliance on Article 18, § 1 of the Arizona…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Northern Natural Gas Company v. GroundsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Yslava v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1993
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Walter Ansley v. Banner Health NetworkArizona Supreme Court · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.