Legal Opinion

Costo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2001No. 99-36101PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Dissent by Judge FERGUSON.

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This tort case is a suit stemming from a personal tragedy. Nollie Costo and Christopher Graham drowned during an employer-sponsored rafting trip, and their estates sued their employer for negligence. But their employer is not an ordinary one. It is the United States Navy. Thus, the suit is barred unless the United States has waived its sovereign immunity. To determine whether the suit can properly proceed, we must confront — yet again — the Feres doctrine, which limits the United States’ waiver of sovereign immunity.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dreier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Regan v. Starcraft Marine, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Schnitzer, Jeffrey v. White, Thomas E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Schoenfeld v. QuammeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API