Legal Opinion
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 2, 2012No. 00-512LPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*40OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint under RCFC 12(b)(1), asserting that the prior filing of a district court action deprived this court of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1500. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS, in part, and DENIES, in part, this motion.
I. BACKGROUND1
From November 1934 through January 1937, Bodcaw Lumber Company of Louisiana, Inc. (Bodcaw Lumber), and Grant Timber & Manufacturing Company of Louisiana, Inc. (Grant Timber) conveyed the surface estates of 180,000 non-contiguous acres to the United States Forest Service (the Forest…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Resource Investments, Inc. and Land Recovery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.