Legal Opinion
McKinley v. Flaherty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1986No. C3-86-54PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Respondent brought suit in conciliation court and obtained a judgment against appellant. Appellant removed the case and when he failed to appear for the trial in district court, the court entered judgment for respondent. The trial court denied appellant’s motion to have, the judgment vacated. We affirm but remand for the trial court to compute interest in favor of respondent.
FACTS
Appellant Ed Flaherty leased some business property to James Holt, a friend of respondent Patricia McKinley. In November 1983, respondent asked Holt if she could store some personal belongings at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hildegarde, Inc. v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Coller v. Guardian Angels Roman Catholic Church of ChaskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hindahl v. American Loan SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Microsoft Corp. v. Ion Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Molenaar v. United Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Bahr v. County of MartinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Strei v. BlaineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.