Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corp. v. Ion Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 24, 2007No. Civ. 05-1935 (JNE/SRN)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERICKSEN, District Judge.
This is an action by Microsoft Corporation to recover damages arising from and to enjoin alleged violations of the Anti-counterfeiting Amendments Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 2318 (2000 & Supp. IV 2004) (amended 2006), by Ion Technologies Cor poration (Ion), The World Online Communications Corporation (World Online), and Paul Martin. Microsoft also seeks to recover damages arising from Ion’s and Martin’s alleged breaches of a settlement agreement entered into in October 2004. Ion, World Online, and Martin assert counterclaims against Microsoft for abuse of process 1…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alltech Communications, LLC v. BrothersDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2008
- Cobb v. PayLease LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Lund v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Microsoft Corp. v. Pronet Cyber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.