Legal Opinion

Bahr v. County of Martin

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1991No. Civ. 4-90-265PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS

This action arises out of the arrest of Keith L. Bahr (“Bahr”) by Martin County deputy sheriffs on April 12, 1988. On the morning of April 12, 1988, Martin County sheriff deputies Ronald R. Willard, Kenneth G. Schwieger, Michael Roggow and James B. Clover were at a farm called Regency Farms to seize property pursuant to a writ of restitution issued by the Martin County District…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adewale v. WhalenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  2. Njema v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. Hoyland v. McMenomyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
  4. Nelson v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  5. Waste Recovery Cooperative of Minnesota v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API