Legal Opinion

Good v. Starker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

Appellant contends (1) that the incorpora-tors of a corporation do not have power to create a super-added liability of .stockholders in the absence of a statute of the state in which the corporation is organized authorizing such creation, and that as there is no such statute in South Dakota, the provision of said paragraph VI of the articles does not create such liability; (2) that the conclusion or adjudication of the court in the sequestration proceedings that the superadded liability art. VI purports to impose is a contractual obligation and that each stockholder is liable thereon, is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Finney v. GuySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Wells v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simons v. GroesbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re TMJ Implants Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  3. Opinion No. Oag 11-82, (1982), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1982
  4. Opinion No. Oag 62-81, (1981), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API