Legal Opinion

Heidenheimer v. Loring

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1894No. 455PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought on April 23, 1891, in the District Court of Galveston County, by Phoebe F. Loring, as the surviving wife of Barnabus T. Loring, deceased, and his children, Fannie E. Loring, Richard F. Loring, Ellen J. Dike, and Alden P. Loring, against Abraham Heidenheimer, individually, and Meyer Bauman and Abraham Heidenheimer as executors of the last will of Samson Heidenheimer, deceased, for the recovery of lots.8 and 9, block 256, in the city of Galveston, and for damages; and to cancel and annul a judgment obtained by Samson Heidenheimer in the District…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Martin v. Robinson, 67 Tex. 368 (Tex. 1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Edwards v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. McCampbell v. DurstTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Fisher v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hammonds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Malakoff Gin Co. v. RiddlespergerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Pitman v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Roberts v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Slavin v. GreeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API