Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Holmes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1904PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. S. J. Brooks.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

Defendant in error, plaintiff below, on the 23d day of January, 1902, exhibited her original petition in the District Court against plaintiffs in error, Hester A. Pitman and her husband C. E. Pitman, defendants below, praying for a cancellation of a certain partition of lands evidenced by the deeds of the respective parties made between them on the 21st day of October, 1884.

In the first amended petition, on which the case was tried, it is alleged in substance that on the 1st day of January, 1871, plaintiff’s father, T. J. Vivian, died intestate, leaving defendant,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bass v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Johnson v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Munson v. HallowellTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Kennedy v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Bremond v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sherman v. SipperTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Swearingen v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Dean v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Hardin v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Stuart v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API