Legal Opinion

Malakoff Gin Co. v. Riddlesperger

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1917No. 2486PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Question certified from the- Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Henderson County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yantis

The questions of law involved herein arise upon certified questions presented by the Fifth Court of Civil Appeals. The very clear statement of the Court of Civil Appeals, and the questions propounded, are as follows, to wit:

“On July 9, 1907, the appellant was a co-partnership composed of H. L. Flagg, J. W. Bartlett and T. A. Bartlett, and on said date the appellees, C. A. Biddlesperger and J. S. Biddlesperger, sold and delivered to said co-partnership their gin house, cotton gin and grist mill, situated in or near the town of Malakoff, Henderson County, Texas, together with the machinery used…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gates v. HooperTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. San Antonio National Bank v. McLaneTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Welsh v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Heidenheimer v. LoringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Daniel v. GoeslTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Dittman v. Model Baking Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Thames v. Rotary Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Texas Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API