Legal Opinion

McCampbell v. Durst

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1889No. 1931PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Cameron. Tried below before Hon. JohnC. Russell.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Presiding Judge.—

James H. Durst died in Nueces County on the 24th day of April, 1858, leaving a will, which was probated in that county on the 3d day of June of that year, and the executors named in the will qualified. The will directed that after payment of all debts the estate should be equally divided between his widow and- three children. Debts to the amount of several thousand dollars were allowed by the executors and established against the estate.

In September or October, 1869, the executors were removed by the County Court of Nueces County, and Mortimer T. Durst, son, and one of…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. McCampbell v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Harrison v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Chapman v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API