Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2009No. 1071506PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

James McKinney appeals from an order of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court entering a summary judgment in favor of Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) on McKinney’s complaint seeking underinsured-motorist benefits. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

I. Facts and Procedural History

McKinney’s vehicle was involved in a collision with a vehicle driven by John Elwin Jackson in the City of Tuscaloosa. Subsequently, McKinney sued Jackson and Nationwide, McKinney’s insurer, in the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court seeking recovery for alleged personal injuries and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 64 v. Personnel Board of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. Easterling v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Argonaut Great Central Insurance v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011
  5. Kendrick v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API