Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1973No. SC 326PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALL, Justice.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, the insurer and the defendant in the trial court, petitioned us for a writ of certiorari to issue to the Court of Civil Appeals to review and reverse an adverse opinion of that court on the ground that a legal question of first impression in Alabama was involved. See Rule 39, Revised Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, as amended, Appendix to Title 7, Code of Alabama, Recompiled 1958 (Cum.Sup.). Upon preliminary examination, we were of the opinion that the writ should issue and so granted the application.

The plaintiff, a minor daughter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Southern American Ins. Co. v. DobsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API