Legal Opinion
Bauer v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 16, 1976No. 20262PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs (who are fifty-eight licensed and practicing chiropractors) brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment clarifying § 56-351, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1962), and requesting an injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with their practice of chiropractic.
The defendants are Annette M. Young, Judith Ehlich, Michael Kale and H. H. Plemmons, who are sued individually and constituting the South Carolina1 Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board); Daniel R. McLeod, as Attorney General, is a defendant by reason of the fact that he is charged with legal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walkenhorst v. KeslerUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Williams v. Capital Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Universal Match Corp. v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniels v. BernardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Attorney General v. RaguckasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Metoyer v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Kale v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990