Kale v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Chief Justice:
This appeal is from an order of the circuit court upholding the constitutionality of S.C. Reg. 61-90 § 101(A) (1989). We affirm.
Appellant is a chiropractor operating a facility licensed by respondent (DHEC) to operate under the name “Kale Chiropractic Day Clinic — 24 Hour Facility.” Appellant wishes to operate and advertise his facility as a “chiropractic hospital” which is specifically prohibited by Reg. 61-90 § 101(A). After DHEC denied his request for repeal of the regulation, appellant commenced this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bauer v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Ex Parte Estate of Evans v. Lynch Ex Rel. Estate of EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Howard v. Owen Steel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991