Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Municipal Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1940No. 28274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The Attorney General concedes that the writ of prohibition ordinarily will not issue in this state where there is an adequate remedy at law available by appeal or otherwise, but he urges that in the present matter the state is possessed of no other remedy which is adequate because of numerous pending cases involving the same question.

The reasoning supporting the second paragraph of the syllabus in State, ex rel. Caley, v. Tax Commission, 129 Ohio St., 83, 193 N. E., 751, applies to the present litigation.

The Municipal Court of Columbus is authorized by Section 1558-51, General…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Caley v. Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Norris v. HodappOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API