State Ex Rel. Norris v. Hodapp
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bv the Court.
The writ of prohibition will not lie when the relator has another adequate remedy. State, ex rel. Brickell, v. Roach, Recr., 122 Ohio St., 117, 170 N. E., 866; State, ex rel. Nolan, v. ClenDening, 93 Ohio St., 264, 112 N. E., 1029.
The writ of prohibition is not available as a substitute for a proceeding on appeal. Silliman v. Court of Common Pleas, 126 Ohio St., 338, 185 N. E., 420; State, ex rel. Young, v. Morrow, Judge, 131 Ohio St., 266, 2 N. E. (2d), 595; State, ex rel. Nicklaus, v. McClelland, Judge, 132 Ohio St., 447, 8 N. E. (2d), 565; State, ex rel. Frasch, v. Miller,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carmody v. JusticeOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Silliman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Brickell v. RoachOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Young v. MorrowOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Frasch v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sparto v. Juvenile CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkeyOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Sunderman v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.