Legal Opinion

Schweitzer v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 18, 2008No. 08-497CPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the complaint of pro se plaintiffs Leo F. Schweitzer, III, and Richard S. Dalberth (“plaintiffs”),1 filed July 9, 2008.2,3 The plaintiffs seek to bring the suit as a class action, challenging the following alleged practices of the defendant, the United States (“defendant” or “government”): “[ojvert and improper techniques to induce plea agreements,” “[majnipulation and structuring of facts to produce and perfect a pleth[o]ra of structured confessional stipulations resulting in factual guilt without the requirement of proving mens…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Tasby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API