Legal Opinion

Ramos v. SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 21, 2011No. 2:07-mj-00981PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum & Order

STEVEN M. GOLD, United States Magistrate Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other employees of defendant, bring this action seeking to recover unpaid prevailing wages for their work on various public works projects. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have also moved for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). Finally, defendant has filed a Daubert motion seeking to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant SimplexGrinnell, formed in 2001, is a “leaderf ]…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. 953 Associates LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Morris v. Affinity Health Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. In re Vitamin C Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Johnson v. Carlo Lizza & Sons Paving, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API