Legal Opinion
In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 26, 2012No. Nos. 06-MD-1738 (BMC)(JO), 05-CV-0453PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
COGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are suing Chinese vitamin C manufacturers for allegedly violating Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, by engaging in a cartel to fix prices and limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. The four main defendants are Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Jiangsu Jiangshan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Northeast Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; and Weisheng Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (collectively “defendants”). Plaintiffs The Ranis Company (“Ranis”) and Magno-Humphries Laboratories, Inc. (“MHL”) move for class…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Flores v. Anjost Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Brooklyn Center for Independence of Disabled v. BloombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.