Legal Opinion

MacKay v. Hardy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1998No. 970251PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

Defendants Roy E. Hardy and Rex L. Jackson appeal for the second time in this case. The original action included a cross-claim by J. Earl Jones1 against Hardy and Jackson for an accounting and winding up of a dissolved partnership. The district court entered judgment in Jones’s favor, and Hardy and Jackson appealed, claiming, inter alia, that the court erred in awarding Jones post-dissolution profits realized by the partnership on Jones’s share of partnership assets. That appeal came before this court in 1995. See MacKay v. Hardy, 896 P.2d 626 (Utah 1995) (“MacKay…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API