Legal Opinion
Norsco Enterprises v. City of Fremont
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1976No. Civ. 35697PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
—This appeal concerns the validity of certain “in lieu fees” levied upon plaintiff Norsco Enterprises or its affiliate Norsco, Inc. (hereafter “Norsco”) by the City of Fremont (hereafter sometimes “City”), under the ostensible authority of Business and Professions Code section 11546 (hereafter “section 11546”). That statute provided, subject to certain conditions, that: “The governing body of a city or county may by ordinance require the dedication of land, the payment of fees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Werner v. Southern California Associated NewpapersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Griffin Development Co. v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- J. W. Jones Companies v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- California Union Insurance v. Central National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Benny v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Goldman v. Town of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.