Legal Opinion
Lidman v. Nugent
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 25, 2000No. AC 18996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
This case comes here on remand from our Supreme Court, Lidman v. Nugent, 252 Conn. 933, 746 A.2d 788 (2000), ordering us to reconsider our decision in Lidman v. Nugent, 55 Conn. App. 905, 741 A.2d 13 (1999), in light of Wichers v. Hatch, 252 Conn. 174, 745 A.2d 789 (2000). The issue is whether the verdict should be set aside as inadequate as a matter of law when the jury returns a verdict awarding the plaintiffs economic damages but zero noneconomic damages. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The incident giving rise to this appeal occurred on December 23, 1994, on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Bartholomew v. SchweizerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Olson v. OlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Silva v. Walgreen Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Wasilewski v. MacHugaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.