Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 771SC932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

There was no error in consolidating the cases for trial. G.S. 15A-926(b)(2)b.2 provides that charges against two or more defendants may be joined for trial when the offenses charged “[w]ere part of the same act or transaction.” Here, each defendant was charged with committing the same breaking and entering, and each defendant was charged with committing larceny after such breaking and entering, albeit of different items of property.

Whether defendants charged with committing identical offenses at the same time and place should be jointly or separately tried is within the sound…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. MaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. LipfirdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API