State v. Sanderson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Defendants present fifteen assignments of error in thirteen arguments. Their first two arguments are that the trial court erred in denying their pre-trial motions and renewed motions for severance of the cases for trial. Hubert Sanderson and Vic Sanderson filed motions for severance, but only Hubert Sander-son raises this argument on appeal. Vic’s assignment of error is deemed abandoned. Rule 10(a), Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The cases of all the appellants were properly joined pursuant to G.S. 15A-926(b)(2) which provides that “upon written motion of the prosecutor,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Sanderson v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- State v. BaizeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.