Legal Opinion

State v. Lipfird

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1980No. 8025SC107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants first assign error to the denial of their motions to dismiss and for appropriate relief. Defendants argue that the “Speedy Trial Act,” G.S. § 15A-701 et seq., was violated since *652they were not brought to trial within 120 days “of [their] arrest on an offense based on the same acts or transactions as Appellants] [were] tried for in the cases at bar.” While we realize that defendants insist they were arrested for “an offense based on the same acts or transactions” at a time earlier than is indicated in the record, there is nothing in the record before us to support this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LipfirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API