Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958No. 73PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellant is the only person charged in the bill of indictment appearing in the record; and the agreed case on appeal states that “defendant Jack Franklin and codefendant Frank Thomas Keith were charged, upon a bill of indictment, as appears in the record, . . .” As to Keith, no indictment appears in the record. However, counsel for appellant, with commendable candor, stated on oral argument that Frank Thomas Keith was indicted in a separate bill containing identical charges and that, each defendant having pleaded not guilty, the cases were consolidated and tried together.

In S. v. Kerley, 246…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. KerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. . ChoateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API