Legal Opinion
Riverdale Mills Corp. v. Pimpare
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 22, 2004No. 04-1626PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves another episode in the ongoing saga of disputes between the owner of a mill and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). An earlier episode is recounted in United States v. Knott, 256 F.3d 20 (1st Cir.2001). This episode involves issues of qualified immunity for EPA inspectors who took waste-water samples.
James M. Knott, Sr., and Riverdale Mills Corporation (“Riverdale”) sued two EPA inspectors, Justin Pimpare and Daniel Granz, alleging violations of the plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. 1 The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Jennings v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Wright v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Estate of Bennett v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Burke v. Town of WalpoleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Whitfield v. Melendez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.