State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions of check forgery, offering a forged check, and theft by swindle, arguing that his right to counsel was denied because the district court (1) improperly denied his request for a public defender; (2) failed to obtain a valid waiver of his right to counsel; and (3) erred in refusing to appoint standby counsel. In addition, appellant asserts that he is entitled to a new trial because of prose-cutorial misconduct. We affirm.
FACTS
Facts Presented at Trial
Appellant Don Jones deposited a check in the amount of $3,600 at Guaranty Bank on…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009