Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 2, 2008No. A07-1168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant challenges his convictions of check forgery, offering a forged check, and theft by swindle, arguing that his right to counsel was denied because the district court (1) improperly denied his request for a public defender; (2) failed to obtain a valid waiver of his right to counsel; and (3) erred in refusing to appoint standby counsel. In addition, appellant asserts that he is entitled to a new trial because of prose-cutorial misconduct. We affirm.

FACTS

Facts Presented at Trial

Appellant Don Jones deposited a check in the amount of $3,600 at Guaranty Bank on…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API