Legal Opinion
Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 4, 2011No. 3:09-cv-00023PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
[Re: Motions at Dockets 42 and 54]
JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTIONS PRESENTED
At docket 42, plaintiffs Organized Village of Kake, et al., move for summary judgment setting aside the Tongass Exemption, reinstating the Roadless Rule, and vacating approved timber sales in conflict with the Roadless Rule. At dockets 53 and 56, intervenor-defendants State of Alaska and Alaska Forest Association oppose the motion, respectively. At docket 54, the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) (jointly “federal defendants…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Alaska v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- State of Alaska v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority v. BidenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
- Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.