Legal Opinion
State of Alaska v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1122PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
[Dkts. ## 45, 46]
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
The complaints in this case seek declaratory and injunctive relief for what the State of Alaska and plaintiff intervenors (collectively, “Alaska”) claim are statutory and administrative-law violations related to the promulgation of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Final Rule and Record of Decision (“Roadless Rule,” or the “Rule”). The federal defendants, United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), et al., move for dismissal of all claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Jem Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Gayla Joy Hendren, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015