Legal Opinion

Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2015No. 11-35517PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge HURWITZ; Concurrence by Judge CHRISTEN; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

OPINION

HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:

In 2001, the United States Department of Agriculture promulgated the “Roadless Rule,” limiting road construction and timber harvesting in national forests. The Department expressly found that exempting the Tongass National Forest from this Rule “would risk the loss of important roadless area [ecological] values.” Just two years later, relying on the identical factual record compiled in 2001, the Department reversed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Watt v. Energy Action Educational FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Ark Initiative v. Thomas TidwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API