Legal Opinion
Williams v. Lopes
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1999No. 3:96 CV 2505(GLG)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendants move for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
The facts set forth in defendants’ Local Rule 9(c) 1 Statement are largely uncontested. They are as follows (exhibit numbers are those attached to moving papers):
1. On August 12, 1996, Danbury police officers Edward Lopes and J. Dinho responded to plaintiffs residence at 157 Shelter Rock Road, Danbury, Connecticut in response to plaintiffs report of a harassment complaint. Plaintiff and her two year old…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Odom v. MatteoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Betancourt v. SlavinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Waananen v. BarryDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Rzayeva v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.